Mantak Chia: Brown Demon

Readin’ this Chia pet‘s books is like talkin’ to a bum on the street who claims to be multi-drunkic, that when he drinks, he doesn’t just get high once, but multiple times. He says the trick to this is to hold in the vomit, and then recycle the Qi (that’s Chinese for drunk power) up to his head, where he can continuously get more and more drunk highs without limit. All he needed to do was to practice holding in the vomit, which takes several thousand tries first before you get it right. Ooops! Guess I’ll have to get drunk a lot, he says.

Chia is going around selling MIPS manuals, gettin’ rich on turnin’ everyone into a whore, corrupting spiritual folks into prurient fiends and destroying the health and well-being of every unfortunate man he touches with his stupid theories. He greatly pleases his Jewish masters. He is unknown in China and Daoist circles – though Western yankees love his multi-deathspasmic ideology. Chia’s program is dressed up as ancient Chinese wisdom. Chia poses as a Chinese named 謝明德, though he is Thai.

Observe the questions and answers, you’ll see that Chia’s teachings are profound – they aren’t just about sex. But to master the teachings, you have to have a lot of sex. Dressed up in the beautiful idea of avoiding seminal emissions, Chia’s program requires hundreds if not thousands of acts of fornication as “practice.” Like Osho’s protocol, the pathway to not sinning is extreme sin and self-destruction.

Poisonographer Jimmy Wales’ Wikipedia✡, has a page named Taoist Sexual Practices, which state in short, “Some Daoists maintain the Dharma of celibacy, while others think you can cheat it.” The article then immediately goes on to quote Joseph Needham and Mantak Chia, and the references at the bottom are almost all from Chia. Neither Needham nor Chia are Chinese, much less Daoists. To the right there’s a blasphemous pornographic painting of two random Chinese people fornicating. (A “Daoist sexual practice” picture should be blank.)

Yet also on the right there’s a Daoism panel reveals the founders of Daoism (yes, the character 道 is read dao4, not “tao”) are: Laozi · Zhuangzi · Zhang Daoling · Zhang Jue…who were all celibates. Laozi is the true founder of Daoism, and he was a celibate leader of a cult of wandering meditators. His death was never documented because he went off into the mountains on a water buffalo.

And that the founding texts of Daoism are: Dao (Tao) · De (Te) · Wuji · Taiji · Yin-Yang · Wu Xing · Qi · Neidan · Wu wei…all of which promote celibacy.

The dieties are listed as: Three Pure Ones · Yu Huang · Guan Shengdi · Eight Immortals · Yellow Emperor · Xiwangmu · Jade Emperor · Chang’e….The Three Pure Ones? Sound celibate to me.

Chia’s fallacies can be summed up as follows:

  1. Jing (literally “sperm power”) can be saved at the last second of the dating game. No mention of wasted Jing on talking to women, texting women, worrying about women, taking care of women…no, no, no. You just grab one, lay her down on a bed and get practicing. It’s like saying to avoid the negative effects of drinking, make sure you hold in the puke.
  2. There is no mention of how much practice would be required to actually begin to engage in MIPS without ejaculation. The true answer to this question is hundreds if not thousands of times, all of which are defiling women, yourself, and you’re even wasting that last second of Jing.
  3. There is no mention of where the Jing really goes once you’ve got the technique. The idea that already created male creative fluid can suddenly be retransformed into marrow or some absorbable substance and sucked up the spine in seconds is pure, lecherous fantasy. What happens to that creative fluid (which is already no longer Qi or Jing) is that it gets backed up into the bladder, goes through the urethral wall into the bloodstream, or worse, blows a hole in the urethra. Do you like tying knots in garden hoses?
  4. There’s no mention of which women/whose women will be used as target practice.
  5. No mention of the havoc that holding in ejaculations does to the prostate and other organs. Our Chinese doctor here says that holding in ejaculations is like hittin’ your prostate with a sledgehammer.

The wikipedia is almost entirely about the creepy and blasphemous nonsense driveled out by Chia, yet there is no picture of him. Here you’ll see why: he is ugly as sin. His eyes are tiny and dull, his skin darkened from toxic buildup, and his teeth are black (he appears to be a heavy smoker). The shape of his face is like that of a child suffering from mongoloid retardation. I’m sorry the reader has to see such a horrible excuse for a human being, but here he is:

An insane blasphemer of the Daoist religion, Mantak Chia

An insane blasphemer of the Daoist religion, Mantak Chia

Insane blasphemer of the Daoist religion, Mantak Chia

Notice the difference in teeth

Another misandrist Jew and promoter of little Chia, Dr. Alex Benzer. When not busy writing evil books for your pleasure, Benzer is out humping your sister, wife or daughter with his circumstump to practice his amazing religious knowledge

And finally, this question does not even need to be mentioned for most readers: Who is promoting this scumbag? Why of course, kosher and highly-credentialed windbags like Dr. Alex Benzer, another misandrist Jew and promoter of little Chia. When he’s not busy writing evil books for your short-term pleasure, Benzer is out humping your sister, wife or daughter with his circumstump to practice his amazing religious knowledge.

Chia's publisher

Chia's publisher

Chia’s publisher is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. Multi-orgasmic Murdoch screws Chinese by publishing Chia’s works and literally screws them in his bedroom with his circumstump. Utterly disgusting.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in daoism, jewish, justice, Kali-yuga, karma, politics, sin, yoga and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Mantak Chia: Brown Demon

  1. “Jing (literally “sperm power”) can be saved at the last second of the dating game. No mention of wasted Jing on talking to women, texting women, worrying about women, taking care of women…no, no, no. You just grab one, lay her down on a bed and get practicing. It’s like saying to avoid the negative effects of drinking, make sure you hold in the puke.”

    This. You never hear this. Just talking to a woman for a long period of time is -draining-. The worst non-sexual drain is worry, but talk is up there too. They have an infinite capacity for chatter. I think it’s because they know the longer they talk to you the more energy they’re vamping, so they’ve developed a technique of talking an impossible amount about anything whatever. Talk is just a smokescreen for what’s really going on; energy transfer.

  2. janoklark says:

    The vaginal/female process is a sucking process.

  3. The followers of mantak chia are certainly trying to cheat

Leave a Reply to janoklark Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s